Legal Opinion

Milliken v. United Laundries

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1932No. Appeal 12PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GUwthkop, J.,

Plaintiff, the owner of an automobile, recovered a judgment in the county court of Allegheny County in an action of trespass for damages resulting to his automobile when he drove it into the rear of defendant’s motor truck which had been stopped and was standing on the right side of the public highway on which plaintiff was travelling. This appeal is from the refusal of the court of common pleas to grant an appeal. The single question presented to us is whether plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

Considering the evidence in the light most…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Simrell Et Ux. v. EschenbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Mason v. C. Lewis Lavine, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Filer v. FilerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Cupples, Jr. v. YearickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. O'Rourke v. Washington CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spearing v. StarcherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Wink v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Meads Et Ux. v. RutterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Ellis v. BruceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. Lelar v. Quaker City CabsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API