Legal Opinion

Cervinka v. Horlacher Delivery Service

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 1933No. Appeal, 97PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Defendant appeals from the judgment of the court below overruling its motion for judgment n. o. v., in plaintiff’s action of trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Reading the testimony in the light most favorable to plaintiff, we find she was struck while waiting, at 11:30 o’clock at night, to board a trolley car, at a usual and customary stopping place, in the village of Brady, Northumberland County. The trolley tracks ran along the south side of the highway, referred to as Main Street, between the cartway and sidewalk, the former being twenty feet wide. Plaintiff had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilhelm v. Sunbury & Selinsgrove Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Farley v. VentrescoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. ShatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API