Clister Ray Thomas v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice Carter
Clister Ray Thomas appealed his conviction of failure to comply with sex-offender registration requirements. This Court reversed the judgment of the trial court, finding that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the judgment. Thomas v. State, 411 S.W.3d 685, 693-94 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 2013), rev’d, 444 S.W.3d 4, 11 (Tex.Crim.App.2014). The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed our judgment, holding that the evidence was legally sufficient to support Thomas’ conviction. Thomas, 444 S.W.3d at 11. In this opinion on remand, we are called on to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Ngo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Hutch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Abdnor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Vincent John Zahorik v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Darrel Gene Holloway, II v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2023
- Donald Jean Depriest v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2016
- Gilder, Craig AnthonyTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Jonathan Carbajal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.