Legal Opinion

File v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1979No. Nos. 3482, 3537PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., and CON-NOR, BOOCHEVER, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ. MATTHEWS, Justice.

This is a land dispute. The land in question consists of approximately 117 acres added by accretion to the shoreline of the Gastineau Channel over the last fifty years. The appellants claim that Daniel Pederson, their predecessor in interest, homesteaded the shoreline to which the land accreted, and that the land belongs to them. The state claims that the federal government retained its interest in the shoreline and that the state now owns the accreted land by virtue of selection made under the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Cragin v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Hughes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1865

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Honsinger v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Vernon Fiehler v. T. Anthony Mecklenburg, Catherine Mecklenburg, State of Alaska, City & Borough of Juneau, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Alaska Supreme Court · 2023
  3. State v. Alaska Land Title Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. Alaska Land Title Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API