State v. Alaska Land Title Ass'n
Alaska Supreme Court
1DissentRabinowitz, Chief Justice
I find that I am unable to agree with the court’s conclusion that the State of Alaska or the Municipality of Anchorage is entitled to claim highway easements in excess of those reserved when the parcels in question were conveyed by patent from the federal government. Before discussing the grounds for my disagreement with the court’s ruling, however, I believe that it will be useful to set forth what I consider to be the significant facts.
The principal question in this appeal is whether the state1 must compensate three landowners for portions of their parcels taken to widen existing roads. The…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Jerome Otteson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Beaver CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Cramer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Colorado Coal & Iron Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.