Legal Opinion
Baker v. Osborne Development Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 2008No. E042006PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant Osborne Development Corporation (Osborne) appeals from an order denying its motion to compel arbitration in a construction defect action. We find no error, and we affirm.
II. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs filed a complaint on October 13, 2005, 1 against Osborne, alleging the homes they purchased from Osborne suffered from construction defects in design and workmanship, including, among other things, problems from soil movement; foundation deficiencies; plumbing leaks; stucco, window, and roof problems; finish problems…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Ajamian v. Cantorco2e. L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Bruni v. DidionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Parada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Peleg v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.