Legal Opinion

Lee v. Barefoot

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 3, 1928PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdahs, J.

The errors assigned by the appellants impeach the sufficiency of the description in the deed to Moses Barefoot, the court’s ruling as to the quantity of the estate conveyed by the deed, and the conclusion that actual partition of the land cannot be made without injury to the parties.

*112Tbe appellants claim title to tbe land in controversy under tbe deed from Kenion Barefoot and bis wife to Moses Barefoot; but we need not pause to inquire wbetber tbey are in a position to assert tbat tbe description in tbis deed is vague, uncertain, and void.

We do not understand tbe first conclusion of law to…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Smith v. Proctor.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Gudger v. White.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Jones v. Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Davis v. FrazierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bryant v. . ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Bryant v. ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Duckett v. . LydaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Sugg v. . GreenvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Greer v. . HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API