Daniel v. . Bass
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
With the - exception of the devisees therein named, the second item in each of the three wills is substantially the same, and as Isaac Daniel predeceased his two sisters, we may first consider the words in which he expressed his devise: “To my beloved sisters, Nancy Daniel and Mahala Daniel, ... to them and their heirs forever, if any. If not, to the heirs of my sisters, Mary Jane Hathaway, Celia Bass, and Sallie Rowe, to them and their assigns forever.”
It may be said, in the first place, that the devise is not within the scope or provisions of the rulé in Shelley’s case. In Coke’s definition…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Carroll v. HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Wool v. Fleetwood.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Jones v. . WhichardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Reid v. . NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- McIver v. . McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Artis v. . ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Barco v. . OwensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Williamson v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Williamson v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Hambright v. . CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.