Legal Opinion
Bettie Jane Newhouse v. John Misterly, Sheriff
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 20, 1969No. 22293_1PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
Habeas corpus. The petition was denied and Newhouse appeals. On Janu ary 5, 1966, in the Municipal Court of Sacramento County, California, a jury found Newhouse guilty of a violation of Cal. Veh. Code § 23102 (drunk driving). This conviction was affirmed on an appeal to the Appellate Department of the Sacramento County Superior Court. In such a case California provides for further appellate review by an application for certification of the appeal to the California Court of Appeal. See Rule 63, Cal. Rules of Court. Newhouse did not make such an application but sought…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Leavitt v. AraveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- LP v. Natrona County Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Elson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.