State v. Henry
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
I
The first issue before us concerns whether pursuant to R.C. 2901.02(B), aggravated murder is a capital offense requiring separate trials for jointly indicted defendants, where there has been no application for a joint trial as required by Crim. R. 14 and R.C. 2945.20.
The appellant, state of Ohio, contends that as a consequence of the United States Supreme Court decision in Furman v. Georgia (1972), 408 U.S. 238, and the general invalidation of Ohio’s death penalty provisions in Lockett v. Ohio (1978), 438 U.S. 586, death can no longer be inflicted as punishment. Therefore, the state argues…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. LiberatoreOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. ScottOhio Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ColemanOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. GriffinOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. HarwellOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. Corrigan v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.