Wilbert Price v. M&H Valve Company
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
Plaintiff-Appellant Wilbert Price appeals through counsel the district court’s grant of summary judgment, pursuant to(Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c)), to his current employer, M & H Valve Company, a company that manufactures and sells valves and hydrants for commercial use, on his claims of failure to promote and disparate impact in training, based on race, filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a) and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and retaliation, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3. 1 Price argues on appeal that the district court erred in concluding that…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Anderson v. Dunbar Armored, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009
- Riley v. University of Alabama Health Services Foundation, P.C.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014
- Edwards v. Niles Sales & Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2006
- Ambus v. Autozoners, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2013
- Williams v. Hawkeye Community CollegeDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.