Legal Opinion
Bonhomme v. St. James
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided March 10, 2011No. 2-10-0036Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
945 N.E.2d 1181 (2011)
Paula BONHOMME, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Janna ST. JAMES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 2-10-0036.
Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District.
March 10, 2011.
Rehearing Denied April 8, 2011.
Daliah Saper, Saper Law Offices, LLC, Chicago, for Paula Bonhomme.
Phyllis J. Perko, Law Offices of Harlovic & Perko, West Dundee, for Janna St. James.
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · McLARENJustice McLAREN
Plaintiff, Paula Bonhomme, appeals from the orders of the trial court dismissing with prejudice her second and third amended complaints. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
The following facts were alleged…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Doe v. DillingIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
- NEUROSURGERY AND SPINE SURGERY v. GoldmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Weidner v. KarlinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Marino v. United Bank of Illinois, N.A.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Childs v. Pinnacle Health Care, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.