Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Williams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 9, 1917No. 7964PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error .from County Court, Pittsburg County; S. A. Brown, Judge. Action by G. W. Williams against P. W. Kinney. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant 'brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This was an action for damages alleged to have accrued by reason of the breach of warranty in the sale of two oil tanks. The plaintiff in error was the vendor and the defendant, and the defendant in error was the vendee and plaintiff in the trial court. There was a trial to the court and a jury and a verdict returned in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $230. Upon the overruling of the motion for a new trial judgment was rendered for the amount of the verdict and for the costs. To review which this appeal has been per-feeted. The facts, briefly stated, are as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. A. B. Farquhar Co., Limited v. ShermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Dickerson v. Incorporated Town of EldoradoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sand Springs Railway Co. v. WesthaferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Pure Oil Co. v. ChisholmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. State Guaranty Bank v. DoerflerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Young v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Rock Island Coal Mining Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API