State v. Wofford
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
201 P.3d 389 (2009)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Donald Anainise WOFFORD, Appellant.
No. 36444-1-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
February 18, 2009.
Dana M. Lind, Nielsen Broman & Koch PLLC, Jonathan Michael Palmer, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Kathleen Proctor, Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney Office, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.
PART PUBLISHED OPINION
ARMSTRONG, J.
¶ 1 Donald Anainise Wofford appeals his conviction of violating a domestic violence no-contact order. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, arguing that the State failed to prove that his…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Rozner v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. AlvaradoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BunkerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BunkerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Department of Labor & Industries v. SlaughCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.