Legal Opinion
Trierweiler v. Croxton & Trench Holding Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 6, 1996No. Nos. 94-1514, 94-1522PublishedCited by 212 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Daniel J. Trierweiler loaned Croxton and Trench Holding Corporation (“C&T”) $1.2 million. The debtor defaulted, and Trierweiler seeks to recover his investment. Following two unsuccessful lawsuits before the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Trierweiler appeals the dismissal of several of his claims for failure to comply with Colorado’s certificate of review requirement and for lack of personal jurisdiction over one defendant. He also appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment on statute of limitations grounds…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by212 opinions
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Trujillo v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Hill v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Dudnikov v. Chalk & Vermilion Fine Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
207 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.