Legal Opinion

State v. Ashby

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2017No. 20160157PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kapsner, Justice.

[¶ 1] The State appeals from a district court order granting Caren Ashby’s motion to suppress evidence seized after a traffic stop. Suppression was based on the district court’s conclusion that the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop. The State argues the traffic stop was supported by reasonable suspicion. We reverse and remand.

I

[¶ 2] Caren Ashby was arrested for several drug related offenses after a traffic stop in Wells County on August 26, 2015. Caren Ashby moved to suppress all evidence seized from the traffic stop, and the State opposed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Anderson v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. EbelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. MatthewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HendricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. PowleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. Van Der HeeverNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State v. WernerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  5. State v. HendricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API