Legal Opinion

International Shoe MacHine Corp. v. United States

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 30, 1973No. Civ. A. 70-317-GPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

GARRITY, District Judge.

This is a tax refund suit in which the plaintiff taxpayer asserts that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue erroneously treated income realized from the plaintiff’s sales of certain shoe machines as ordinary income instead of treating the income under the capital gains provisions of the Code. The court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1340, 1346(a)(1).

The plaintiff, a well-known manufacturer of shoe machinery, is a Massachusetts corporation with its principal place of business in Brighton, Massachusetts. During the years in question — 1964…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Corn Products Refining Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Malat v. RiddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Commissioner v. Gillette Motor Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mafco Equip. Co. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API