Legal Opinion

Hogan v. State ex rel. Van Antwerp

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 13, 1970No. 1 Div. 23PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADLEY, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of Mobile County denying appellant’s motion to tax as costs appel*242lant’s attorney’s fees and other costs against appellee who was the unsuccessful informant in a quo warranto proceeding against appellant.

Appellee had instituted quo warranto proceedings against appellant to test his right to hold the office of Special Judge of- the Court of General Sessions of Mobile County, Alabama. And at the time the proceeding was filed, appellee, pursuant to Title 7, Section 1137, Code of Alabama 1940, as Recompiled 1958, gave security for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jansky v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  2. Low v. LowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. Penney v. Pritchard & McCallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Troup v. Morgan CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Stanley v. BeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keeling v. KeelingCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  2. Hogan v. State ex rel. Van AntwerpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. Keeling v. KeelingCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API