Local Trademarks, Inc. v. Rubin

This is an action of contract to recover on a written contract. The answer of the defendant is a general denial and an allegation that the contract was procured by fraud and is therefore unenforceable.

There is no need of discussing the evidence. The trial judge made the following findings of fact:

“I find that the signature of the defendant to the contract, upon which this suit is based, was procured by the fraudulent representation of the plaintiff’s agent; that the agent led the defendant to believe that the contract price would cover the cost of newspaper advertising, and that the defendant…