Legal Opinion

Shea v. HOUSEHOLD BANK (SB)

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 2003No. G028955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RYLAARSDAM, J.

Defendant Household Bank (SB), National Association appeals from an order denying its petition to compel plaintiff James B. *87Shea to arbitrate his claims for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation. Defendant contends plaintiff is bound to arbitrate under the terms of an amendment to plaintiff’s credit card agreement. Plaintiff raises numerous arguments to defeat the arbitration agreement’s enforceability. We conclude plaintiff is not bound by the amendment and affirm.

Facts

In 1993,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Szetela v. Discover BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Mangarella v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Clark County Sports Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  5. United States v. State EngineerNevada Supreme Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Strand v. US NATL. BANK NATL. ASS'N NDNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Mandel v. Household Bank (Nevada)California Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Lawrence v. Household Bank (SB), N.A.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004
  4. Shea v. HOUSEHOLD BANK (SB)California Court of Appeal · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API