Legal Opinion

Mangarella v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 2001No. 35212PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this appeal, Michael Attilio Mangarella challenges the constitutionality of NRS 176A.410, which imposes mandatory conditions of probation on individuals sentenced to probation after having been convicted of certain sexual offenses. Mangarella contends that (1) the statute’s polygraph requirement is overbroad, thereby infringing upon his privilege against self-incrimination, and (2) the statute is unconstitutionally vague because it does not adequately define residence, work, and curfew requirements.

We conclude that because NRS 176A.410 does not allow an unbridled examination of the…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. McKay v. Board of Sup'rs of Carson CityNevada Supreme Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by32 opinions

  1. Flamingo Paradise Gaming, LLC v. ChanosNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. United States v. James CranleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Wilson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Walker v. Eighth Judicial District Court of State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. ColosimoNevada Supreme Court · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API