Legal Opinion

People v. HAJJAJ

California Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 2010No. S175307PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

In this case, as in People v. Engram (2010) 50 Cal.4th 1131 [116 Cal.Rptr.3d 762, 240 P.3d 237] (Engram), the trial court concluded that on the last day established by Penal Code section 1382 for bringing this Riverside County criminal proceeding to trial, there were no courtrooms or judges available to try the case. Defendant objected to any further continuance and, at his request, the court scheduled a hearing for the following day on his motion to dismiss the action. At the conclusion of that hearing, the trial court granted defendant’s motion, pursuant to section 1382.

O…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Rhinehart v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Owens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. EngramCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. Accredited Surety Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. People v. Superior Court of Riverside CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. People v. Bilbrey, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Burgos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. People v. VillanuevaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API