Legal Opinion

People v. Villanueva

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 2011No. B222580; No. B227268PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

Defendant and appellant Roberto Villanueva was charged with attempted murder and mayhem; various firearm enhancements were alleged. Defendant was convicted of attempted murder and mayhem, but the jury hung on the truth of the two most serious firearm enhancements. A mistrial was declared with respect to the enhancements on which the jury hung. Defendant was sentenced to prison for the attempted murder. The firearm enhancements were not dismissed. Defendant filed an immediate notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction. We reversed defendant’s conviction due to the trial…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. LomaxCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. MongeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Sykes v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. Dorsey CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. People v. IrahetaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. People v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API