Williams v. Hinckley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE FINCH Delivered the Opinion of the Court.
The trial court sustained demurrers to the amended complaint herein without leave to amend and thereafter entered judgment in favor of the defendants for costs. The plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment.
The plaintiffs attempted to state a cause of action to establish a trust in their favor in an oil and gas lease given by the defendants E. M. and Elizabeth Carlisle to the defendant Hinckley on the third day of December, 1926. The complaint alleges in substance that during the year 1923 the Carlisles executed an oil and gas…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Metzger v. VestalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gilman v. NemetzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Flynn v. MikelianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Caudle v. BrannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Tri-City Medical-Surgical Park Ass'n v. Burch (In Re Vista Medical Investors, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1989