Legal Opinion

Mid Dakota Clinic P.C. v. Livengood

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 2017No. 20170029Published

1Opinion of the Court

VandeWalle, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Mid Dakota Clinic appealed a district court’s order denying its motion to vacate a satisfaction of judgment. We conclude the district court abused its discretion in failing to vacate the erroneously filed satisfaction of judgment. We reverse.

I

[¶2] A default judgment was entered against Sara Livengood in December 2008. In 2012, Mid Dakota Clinic’s counsel filed a “Full Satisfaction of Judgment” with the district court. However, this filing contained errors; the document had Mid Dakota Clinic and Livengood’s case number but different pai’ties listed as plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kukla v. KuklaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Grager v. SchudarNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Norberg v. NorbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Acme Harvester Co. v. MagillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Erickson v. OlsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API