Coastland Corp. v. County of Currituck
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Circuit Judge:
Coastland Corporation filed suit in district court seeking damages from Currituck County under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and under the fifth and fourteenth amendments. Coastland’s amended complaint alleges due process violations actionable under § 1983 that arose from the County’s failure to enforce the liquidated damages clause of a water and sewer contract. The complaint also sets forth an inverse condemnation claim arising from the County’s land use regulation. The district court granted Currituck’s motion for summary judgment on the § 1983 claim but held that there were…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ayres v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Snyder v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nicholson Air v. Board of County Commissioners of Allegany CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Piedmont Behavioral Health Center, LLC v. StewartDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2006
- Stewart v. HuntDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1984
- A. Aiudi & Sons v. Town of PlainvilleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- Bennett v. MonetteDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.