San Jose Water Company v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY, Case No. 24-cv-05780-EKL 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD Re: Dkt. No. 38 COMPANY, 11 Defendant. 12 13 In this eminent domain case, Plaintiff San Jose Water Company (“SJWC”) seeks to acquire 14 a permanent easement on sections of a railway corridor owned by Defendant Union Pacific 15 Railroad Company (“Union Pacific”). Before the Court is Union Pacific’s motion for summary 16 judgment, which contends that SJWC has not produced evidence that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.