Legal Opinion

Williams v. Beebe

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1914No. 11678PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Webster, J., entered May IS, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the Court

Chadwick, J.-

-No exceptions were taken to the findings of the court, and it is conceded that we are not called upon to review the testimony. The findings in this case support the judgment that was entered, unless the court has proceeded upon a wrong theory of the law. Appellant insists that the real question in the case is still open — that plaintiff does not state a. cause of action in that he alleges that the lease, which is the foundation of the action, was executed by Mrs. M. A. Beebe, the wife of the defendant C. E. Beebe; that the presumption is that it was her separate contract and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Main v. SchollWashington Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Hammond v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Short v. DollingWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Balkema v. GrolimundWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Streck v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API