Legal Opinion · Dissent

Phelps v. Childers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1939No. 28853Published

1Dissent

This is an action in mandamus filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants, the State Auditor and State Treasurer, to require said defendants to receive, file, approve, and pay their claims for services performed by them under authority of House Bill No. 239, which bill, including the title, is in words and figures as follows:

"An Act making it the duty of certain Justices of the Supreme Court to prepare an annotated compilation of all laws of this state relating to civil and probate procedure, together with proper explanatory notes thereon, same to be filed in the State Library as a public…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. State v. SmileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. De Hasque v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. State ex rel. Attorney General v. MooresNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Trapp, State Auditor v. Cook Const. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API