Legal Opinion
State v. Shoen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 29, 1999No. CX-98-1661PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.
In November 1996, appellant Peter James Shoen was found guilty of first-degree premeditated murder in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.185(1) (1998) for killing his wife. On his first appeal to this court, we determined that the district court erred when it ordered Shoen to wear a leg restraint throughout trial without making appropriate findings to support its decision. See State v. Shoen (Shoen I), 578 N.W.2d 708, 714-15 (Minn.1998). Concluding that the record was insufficient to indicate whether the jury had seen or was prejudiced by Shoen’s restraint, we…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Deck v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- State v. VanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. MantheySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Bonnie Ann Lindquist, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.