People v. Rowland
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
AISO, J. pro tem. *
Defendant Arnold Franklin Rowland was convicted of an assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245) by a court, sitting without a jury. Sentenced to state prison, he appeals from the judgment of conviction.
Appellant’s Contentions
The crux of the defendant’s contentions of error is that by erroneous exclusion of relevant evidence, the trial court thwarted his counsel’s attempt to put on an adequate defense. The theory of the defense was that defendant was warding off a homosexual advance by the alleged victim and prosecution witness, Leon Frieke, and that the gun was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. YokumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- People v. WhittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- People v. ShoemakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.