Legal Opinion

State v. Miranda

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 12, 1978PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLongo, J.

A jury found the defendant, Miguel A. Miranda, guilty of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree in violation of § 53a-55 (a) (1) of the General Statutes. The defendant admitted that he shot the victim, Daniel Germany, and testified that he acted in self-defense when Germany attacked him with a knife. His only claim on appeal is that the trial court erred in excluding from evidence Germany’s record of convictions of crimes of violence. We agree. _

Germany had a lengthy criminal record. The defendant’s offer of proof was limited to two convictions of breach of peace by assault in 1965, a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. AmosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Dempsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. United States v. James H. BurksCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. People v. LynchIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. GoochSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. State v. MasonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. State v. RamosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API