Legal Opinion

Gales v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 2017No. ED 105345PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Presiding Judge

Introduction

Christopher Gales (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.0351 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing.' Movant claims the motion court erred in denying his request for post-conviction relief because plea counsel was ineffective for unreasonably’pressuring him to plead guilty. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

The State charged Movant as a- prior and persistent offender with one count each of first-degree assault, first-degree robbery, and first-degree burglary, and three counts of armed criminal action.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Weeks v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  3. Wilkins v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. Dorsey v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  5. Loudermilk v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brian C. Lee v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. CORY D. JONES, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. John R. Starks III v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Julius White v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. KENNETH M. SAUTER, JR., Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API