Gales v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Presiding Judge
Introduction
Christopher Gales (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.0351 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing.' Movant claims the motion court erred in denying his request for post-conviction relief because plea counsel was ineffective for unreasonably’pressuring him to plead guilty. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
The State charged Movant as a- prior and persistent offender with one count each of first-degree assault, first-degree robbery, and first-degree burglary, and three counts of armed criminal action.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Weeks v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- Wilkins v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Dorsey v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Loudermilk v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brian C. Lee v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
- CORY D. JONES, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
- John R. Starks III v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
- Julius White v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
- KENNETH M. SAUTER, JR., Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.