Legal Opinion
Melveney v. McCrane
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 21, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
138 N.J. Super. 456 (1976)
351 A.2d 385
KENNETH A. MELVENEY AND NATALIE MELVENEY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
JOHN McCRANE AND BEATRICE McCRANE, DEFENDANTS,
BERTHA M. O'DONNELL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT,
FRANKLIN D. SOGORKA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 10, 1975.
Decided January 21, 1976.
Before Judges FRITZ, SEIDMAN and MILMED.
Mr. Neil I. Kilstein argued the cause for the defendant-appellant Bertha M. O'Donnell (Messrs. Kreiger, Karas & Kilstein, attorneys).
Mr. Daniel Crystal argued the cause for the plaintiffs-respondents, Kenneth A. Melveney and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ellsworth Dobbs, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Louis Kamm, Inc. v. FlinkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Louis Schlesinger Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- STATE BY VAN RIPER v. Atlantic City Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- McCann v. BissSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Marmis v. Solot Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Raul International Corp. v. Sealed Power Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
- Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993