Legal Opinion
Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo Realtors
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 16, 1993Published
1Opinion of the Court
132 N.J. 426 (1993)
625 A.2d 1110
EMILY S. HOPKINS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
FOX & LAZO REALTORS, JACK BURKE REAL ESTATE, INC., STEPHEN FIELDS AND PAT GUERRY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND JOHN GARVER, SUSAN GARVER, HIS WIFE; U.S. HOME CORPORATION, MORGAN M. DAVIS, DOUGLAS M. SONIER AND BARBARA A. SONIER, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued January 20, 1993.
Decided June 16, 1993.
Charles Peter Hopkins, II, argued the cause for appellants.
John G. Devlin argued the cause for respondent (Devlin, Cittadino & Shaw, attorneys).
Marc D. Policastro submitted a brief on behalf of amicus…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Dissent.
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Mounsey v. EllardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.