Remiszewski v. American Family Insurance
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
¶ 1. This opinion addresses an appeal and a cross-appeal in an insurance coverage dispute between American Family Insurance Company and its insured, Amy Remiszewski. At summary judgment, the trial court ruled that the reducing clauses in the three American Family policies at issue were unenforceable. American Family appeals this ruling. However, the court also ruled that the anti-stacking provisions in the policies were enforceable. Remiszewski cross-appeals this ruling.
¶ 2. We conclude that both the reducing clauses and the anti-stacking provisions of the American Family policies are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Badger Mutual Insurance v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Fox Ex Rel. Fricker v. Catholic Knights Insurance SocietyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against TrewinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Commercial Union Midwest Insurance v. VorbeckCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Plastics Engineering Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Progressive Northern Insurance v. HallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Ruenger v. SoodsmaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- Myers v. General Cas. Co. of WisconsinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- ACUITY v. Estate of Michael ShimetaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.