Legal Opinion
Myers v. General Cas. Co. of Wisconsin
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided February 2, 2005No. 04-0827PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
¶ 1. William J. Myers appeals from a declaratory judgment granted in favor of his motor vehicle insurer, General Casualty Company of Wisconsin. Myers argues that the trial court incorrectly determined that an uninsured motorist (UM) reducing clause in the General Casualty policy is valid and not contextually ambiguous. We uphold the trial court's rulings and consequently affirm the judgment.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2. The parties do not dispute the facts. On July 25, 1997, Myers was operating a motor vehicle in the course of his employment when he was struck by a vehicle driven by an uninsured motorist.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Nicholson v. Home Insurance Companies, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Badger Mutual Insurance v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against TrewinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Klinger v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006