Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance v. Fahey

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1987No. 17008PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALTERS, Justice.

We have accepted certification from the United States District Court of the following question:

Whether an insurance company which provides both worker’s compensation insurance and uninsured motorist coverage for a particular automobile accident is entitled, under a written provision of the uninsured motorist policy, to offset the amount recovered by the injured party under the worker’s compensation policy against any amount which may be payable under the uninsured motorist policy?

Plaintiff Continental Insurance Company provides both workers’ compensation insurance and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chavez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Schmick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Sandoval v. ValdezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Codling v. Aztec Well Servicing Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Castro v. BassNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Renetta M. Miera v. Dairyland Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. Schlieter v. CarlosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Jimenez v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Draper v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Harger v. Structural Services, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API