Legal Opinion

State v. Murphy

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MeRedith, Judge:

Defendant was convicted of a violation of the prohibition laws and assigns error.

The indictment is in the statutory form and is sufficient.

The only substantial error assigned is that the court misdirected the jury. No written instructions were offered, but the following shows the directions given by the court, including the objections made by defendant’s counsel:

*478“Gentlemen of the jury, there will be no written instructions in this case. As to the law in the case, the Court instructs you that the burden is on the State to prove all the essential allegations of the case by a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. State v. ClarkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. HuffmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Raines v. FaulknerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State v. Andy ScurlockWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State v. CutlipWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. State v. FitzsimmonsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API