Legal Opinion
Van Kannel Revolving Door Co. v. Uhrich
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 21, 1924No. Nos. 6266, 6267PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
In a suit brought by the Van Kannel
Revolving Door Company, a corporation, hereafter the complainant, against Oscar W. Uhrich and Burns H. Uhrich, doing business as the Atchison Revolving Door Company, defendants, the court below on May 22, 1917, decreed that the complainant was the owner of letters patent No. 656,062, for improvements in revolving doors; that the defendants had infringed claims 1, 2, and 8 of that patent; that they were enjoined from continuing that infringement, that Hon. W. P Dillard, of Ft. Scott, Kan., was appointed a special master to ascertain and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Manufacturing Co. v. CowingSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Hurlbut v. SchillingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- William T. Graham and Graham-Hoeme Plow Co., Inc. v. Jeoffroy Mfg., Inc., Roy Jeoffroy and Ray L. JeoffroyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Cincinnati Car Co. v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Ruth v. Stearns-Roger Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1935
- American Motorists Ins. Co. v. BuschDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
- Middleton v. WileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.