Legal Opinion

People v. Johnston

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1940No. Crim. 3277PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

Appellant and one Hazel Parker were accused by information of the crime of violating subdivision 6 of section 337a of the Penal Code, in that they “did . . . lay, make, offer and accept a bet and bets and wager and wagers upon the result and purported result of a trial ... of speed and power of endurance between beasts, to-wit, horses’’. At a trial before the court without a jury appellant was found guilty. She now appeals from the order denying her motion for a new trial. There is also a purported appeal from the “judgment’’.

The case was presented to the superior court upon the transcript of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  3. People v. SkoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. DarcyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. People v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. People v. MasottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. People v. SerpaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API