People v. Rudolph
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Smith, J.
CPL 720.20 (1) says that, where a defendant is eligible to be treated as a youthful offender, the sentencing court “must” determine whether he or she is to be so treated. We hold that compliance with this statutory command cannot be dispensed with, even where defendant has failed to ask to be treated as a youthful offender, or has purported to waive his or her right to make such a request. In so holding, we overrule People v McGowen (42 NY2d 905 [1977]).
I
Defendant was charged with several counts of felony drug possession, committed when he was 17 years old. He…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. RegisterNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. FeingoldNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. LevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- People v. ReomeNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. PepperNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by404 opinions
- The People v. William Middlebrooks / The People v. Fabrice LoweNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- The People v. Anthony N. PacherilleNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- S.B. v. A.C.C.New York Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. FrancisCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2018
- Palladino v. CNY Centro, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2014
399 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.