Legal Opinion

Carrouche v. City of New Orleans

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided December 9, 1998No. Civil Action 96-3464Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

FELDMAN, District Judge.

Before the Court is the City of New Orleans’s Motion to Abstain. For the reasons that follow, the Motion is GRANTED.

Background

This dispute arises from the City of New Orleans’s historical underfunding of the Firefighters Pension and Relief Fund. Plaintiffs complain that the City’s failure to properly appropriate money for the Fund frustrates the Board of Trustees’ obligation to maintain sufficient resources to make benefits payments to plan participants.

The plaintiffs have previously sued the City for under-funding the pension fund. In 1989, the Fund…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Juidice v. VailSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API