Legal Opinion

Tom P. McDermott, Inc. v. Birks

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 22, 1964No. 40414PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

Defendant in error instituted this action against plaintiffs in error to recover damages for injuries sustained by him in a collision of motor vehicles. Our continued reference to the parties will be as they appeared in the trial court.

At the conclusion of the trial below the jury returned a general verdict in plaintiff’s favor in the sum of $20,000.00. From such judgment and the overruling of their motion for a new trial, defendants appeal.

For reversal defendants advance two propositions. The first is that “It was error for the trial court to submit to the jury the question…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shawnee-Tecumseh Traction Co. v. GriggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Pacific National Fire Insurance Company v. WoodsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blanke v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. O'Banion v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. 36 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 220, prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,226 Stanley John O'BaniOn and Louise O'BaniOn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. And the Celotex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. Blanke v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API