Legal Opinion

O'Banion v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 30, 1992No. 90-5175PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SAFFELS, District Judge.

This is a products liability and negligence action brought under Oklahoma law. Plaintiff-appellants alleged that Stanley O’Banion suffered from asbestos-related disease as a result of exposure to the defendant-appellees’ asbestos-containing products.1 Plaintiff Stanley John O’Banion worked from 1962 through 1980 as a plumber and pipefitter. Following a one week trial, beginning on June 21, and ending on June 29, 1990, a verdict for the defendants was rendered.

On appeal, plaintiff-appellants contend that the district court erred in its pre-trial rulings which resulted…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. James Leroy Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation and Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  3. Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  4. Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  5. Big Horn Coal Company v. Commonwealth Edison Company, Black Butte Coal Company v. Commonwealth Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 36 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 220, prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,226 Stanley John O'BaniOn and Louise O'BaniOn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. And the Celotex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API