Legal Opinion

Antrim v. Pittman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1973No. 38519PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Clyde Pittman, a buyer of corporate shares, claimed breach of an ancillary covenant by the seller not to compete. Part of the covenant restrained the seller, Patrick Antrim, from engaging in a “similar business as conducted by the corporation. ...” A jury returned a verdict for Pittman, and the district court overruled the motion of Antrim for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Antrim appeals. He asserts that the interpretation of the covenant in the district court was erroneous and that it imposed on him a restraint unreasonable in character.

Antrim, owner of two-thirds of the issued and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wittenberg v. MollyneauxNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Farmers State Bank v. Petersburg State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  3. BARKALOW BROTHERS COMPANY v. Floor-Brite, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robbins v. FinlayUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Standard Meat Co. v. FeerhusenNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Jim Daws Trucking, LLC v. Daws, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2025
  4. Jim Daws Trucking, LLC v. Daws, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API