Legal Opinion

McLaren Products Co. v. Cone Co. of America

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 14, 1925PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INCH, District Judge.

This is a patent suit. The suit is brought by a trustee of the legal title for the benefit of Alexander Mc-Laren, the equitable owner, etc., and the McLaren Products Company, an exclusive licensee.

The defendant is a corporation organized under the state of Delaware, and having a regular place of business at Brooklyn, N. Y., Eastern District.

The complaint is in the usual form, except that it originally claimed that the defendant was infringing- three letters patent belonging to plaintiff, to wit, Abrahams patent, No. 841,211, dated January 15, 1907, a reissued patent of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Pickering v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Brinkerhoff v. AloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. General Electric Co. v. P. R. Mallory & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  5. American Cone & Wafer Co. v. DenaroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Denaro v. Maryland Baking Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1930
  2. Ostby & Barton Co. v. JungersenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
  3. (PC) Rivera v. RodriguezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. Brown v. BazeDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
  5. Carrea v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API