Legal Opinion

Simundza v. Simundza

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 2, 2004No. G032753PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FYBEL, J.

INTRODUCTION

Barbara A. Simundza and Richard J. Simundza1 entered into a stipulated marital dissolution judgment under which Barbara agreed to accept the sum of $200 from Richard’s monthly pension benefit for 12 years following his *1515retirement. Barbara contends the value of the pension benefit has increased since the parties entered into the stipulated judgment in 1983, and thus the pension benefit was only partially divided in the judgment. Relying on In re Marriage of Melton (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 931 [33 Cal.Rptr.2d 761] (Melton), she filed a motion to further divide the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Founding Members of Newport Beach Country Club v. Newport Beach Country Club, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. In Re Marriage of IbertiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Nairne v. Jessop-HumbletCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lesnik v. Eisenmann SEDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  2. Diener v. McBeth (In Re Diener)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Thorne v. RaccinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Dalgleish v. Selvaggio (In re Dalgleish), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Hibbard v. HibbardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API