Legal Opinion

Ryan v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 23, 1986No. 85-2630PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

delivered, the opinion of the court:

The issues emanating from this appeal are whether: (1) the city of Chicago can retain for its own use all interest and income derived from certain pension fund taxes during the first 30 days after their receipt by the city; and (2) plaintiffs are entitled to restitution of all interest earned on pension tax funds withheld by the city of Chicago between January 1, 1979, and October 10, 1984.

Pursuant to statute, defendant city of Chicago (city) maintains four pension funds (pension funds): Policemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund; Firemen’s Annuity and Benefit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Board of Commissioners v. County of Du PageIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Board of Trustees v. Village of Glen EllynAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949
  5. Village of Pawnee v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ryan v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. Kimco Corp. v. Murdoch, Coll and Lillibridge, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  3. City of Chicago v. KorshakAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Buhle v. Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Valasquez v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API