State v. Cheek
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Defendant assigns as error the court’s allowing into evidence, over defendant’s objections, testimony with respect to prior assaults on prosecuting witness Betty Jordan by defendant. This testimony, of course, is relative to the assault charge as to which defendant was found guilty and the court continued prayer for judgment. In State v. Bryant, 23 N.C. App. 373, 374, 208 S.E. 2d 723 (1974), Judge Britt, speaking for the Court, said: “It is well established that a 'prayer for judgment continued’ is not a final judgment, therefore, it is not appeal-able.” However, the rule is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- State v. CaronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. WidemonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Florence v. HiattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. PoppCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Whedbee v. PowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.